INVESTIGATORS & SECURITY CONSULTANTS

Blog

Warning on Fake Make-up Tainted by Cyanide and Other Dangerous Chemicals

Surelock, on behalf of its clients, continues to assist the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit (PIPCU) to remove counterfeit cosmetic products from sale

  • Dangerous levels of lead, mercury and cyanide found in the fake make-up
  • Bogus MAC, Benefit and Urban Decay products sold via eBay and Amazon
  • Buyers risk severe allergic reactions as well as long-term health problems
  • Officers suspended 5,500 sites for selling fake goods in past 18 months

Fake make-up loaded with toxic chemicals is flooding into Britain, police warned last night.

Counterfeit versions of leading brands such as MAC, Benefit and Urban Decay have been found with dangerous levels of lead, mercury and even cyanide.

Criminal gangs are using squalid underground laboratories to make huge quantities of the bogus cosmetics, which are then sold through websites including eBay and Amazon.

28C6CC3C00000578-0-image-a-25_1431901239803
The gangs use squalid underground laboratories to make huge quantities of the products, which are then sold through websites including eBay and Amazon

Buyers risk suffering severe allergic reactions as well as long-term health problems. Over the past 18 months investigators have suspended more than 5,500 websites for selling fake luxury goods.

In one shipping container police found more than 4,700 counterfeit versions of MAC products including foundation, bronzer, lip gloss and eye shadow.

Senior detectives at City of London Police are so alarmed they have issued a national alert.

One victim was left fearing for her eyesight when she bought cosmetics from an online company she later discovered was based in China.

Within minutes of applying the fake Urban Decay eye shadow Katie Brown from Cheshire found her eyelids had swollen and her eyesight became so blurry she feared she was going blind.

‘I realised it was fake as soon as I opened it,’ she said. ‘The package looked slightly different and the mirror was a bit wonky, like you might see in a fairground.’

Customers are buying the fake products because they cost a fraction of the genuine article. But trading standards officers have discovered they contain high levels of lead, arsenic, mercury, copper and cadmium.

The heavy metals have been linked to health problems ranging from allergic reactions and skin sensitivity to nerve disorders and even death.

Excessive levels of lead can cause high blood pressure, fertility problems, memory and concentration problems and increased risk of harm to the foetus during pregnancy.

The fraudsters are also producing sun cream, which looks exactly like the real thing but, shockingly, offers no protection against harmful UV rays.

Detective Superintendent Maria Woodall, of the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit, said: ‘Criminals are exploiting every opportunity to fool customers into buying counterfeits in order for them to make some quick cash – putting people’s health, homes and lives at risk.

‘Beauty products are meant to enhance your features, however, the fakes can in fact do quite the opposite.

‘Not only could these products have serious implications for your health and wellbeing but by simply going online and buying from a rogue site or dealer, your personal and financial information is at risk.’

Made in China and Eastern Europe, the fake cosmetics are shipped into the UK in plain containers and packaged by illegal immigrants in sweatshops in the North East. They are typically sold online, on market stalls or in temporary high street shops selling household items at knock-down prices.

As well as top cosmetic brands, other popular counterfeit items are Christian Dior face cream, Estee Lauder night cream and Dove soap and shower gel.

Fake versions of cosmetics by MAC and Benefit have been found to contain up to 19 times the legal level of lead.

28C6CAF400000578-0-image-a-28_1431901965348
In one shipping container police found more than 4,700 counterfeit versions of MAC products including foundation, bronzer, lip gloss and eye shadow. They are shoved into the boxes like this (pictured)

Pregnant women and their unborn babies are particularly vulnerable to some of the dangerous chemicals, which include cancer-causing compounds. Dermatologists have reported a rise in the number of women with skin conditions triggered by use of the counterfeit cosmetics.

Police, who have confiscated products worth £3.5million over the past 18 months, advise customers to check the spelling and grammar on websites and to identify where a seller is based.

They said legitimate luxury brands are very rarely sold at heavily discounted prices, meaning ‘great deals’ are probably too good to be true. Officers also highlighted the dangers of buying other counterfeit goods, including electrical items such as hair curlers and straighteners.

The fake cosmetics trade costs manufacturers more than £300million a year.

Chris Greenwood, Crime Correspondent for the Daily Mail

For the full article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3085665/Warning-fake-make-tainted-cyanide-dangerous-chemicals-Counterfeit-versions-leading-brands-cooked-criminals-squalid-underground-labs.html#ixzz3aTOZpH11

One Direction Merchandise Forger Ordered to Pay Back £140k

The successful prosecution of Gary Simpson followed investigative work carried out by Surelock.

Gary Simpson made copies of bands including One Direction, Justin Bieber and JLS and made counterfeit prints onto clothing he then sold via eBay.

A forger who sold thousands of items of fake One Direction merchandise has been ordered to pay the state his £140,000 ill-gotten gains.

Gary Simpson worked as an amateur football club kitman and used equipment intended for printing numbers on strips to turn out bogus boy band tops. Simpson, 56, of Walkden, had no licence to use popstars’ branding, but fans snapped up £16.99 items bearing crude copies of logos belonging to idols One Direction, Justin Bieber, JLS, The Wanted, Olly Murs and Westlife.

Picture_184660
Gary Simpson, left, and a One Direction hoody he produced

 

A Manchester Crown Court proceeds of crime act hearing was told Simpson made just short of £140,000 from his illegal sideline. He has now been ordered to give up the profits after an investigation into his assets.

They include his home, £50,000 equity in a property bought by his wife, the contents of his bank account, a Citroen Berlingo, his business equipment and a health insurance policy.

JS34244724
He made the kit on equipment intended for printing names and numbers on football strips

 

He made the kit on equipment intended for printing names and numbers on football strips

Judge Andrew Blake told him he must pay within six months – or face 27 months in jail.

Last year Simpson was has given a 16-month sentence, suspended for two years, after admitting eleven trademark offences over two years.

His sentencing hearing was told he was a ‘decent’ man who turned to counterfeiting as his legitimate industrial workwear business faltered and debts piled up.

He was caught out after a representative of the firm which owns JLS’s copyright made a test purchase from Simpson’s eBay page, and found the hoodie he received was counterfeit and poor quality.

Salford trading standards started an investigation, leading to a raid in February on Simpson’s address at Fairfield Road, Walkden and his Worsley warehouse.

He made the kit on equipment intended for printing names and numbers on football strips
Some of the kit peddled by Mr Simpson

 

During the search, Simpson admitted he printed the fakes at Swinton’s Moorside Rangers.

Nicholas Courtney, prosecuting, said: “He admitted he had been using equipment at the football club to apply bands’ logos to clothing. He would find the relevant logos on the internet and download them as templates, and send them to the cutting machine at the football club.

“The counterfeit goods part of the business had been extremely busy – £15,000 in the three months prior to Christmas. Blank hooded tops cost £5.70 plus VAT, and he was able to use the club’s facilities rent-free as he worked there as a volunteer assisting with the kit, so overheads were very limited, selling 25 garments a day. It seems clear, on any basis, the defendant was doing a substantial trade.”

Manchester Evening News

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/one-direction-merchandise-forger-ordered-9265921#ICID=sharebar_twitter

 

 

 

 

 

 

Social Media Advertising Warning from Trading Standards

Once again people who are using social media to advertise their businesses are being urged to do it legally after Trading Standards in Swansea has achieved another successful Prosecution.

The call follows a latest court case at West Glamorgan Magistrates Court in which a Swansea man received significant fines for advertising services which he was not entitled to offer.

The offences related to a credit brokerage and debt advice business operated by David Sean Govier from Loughor, Swansea.

Mr Govier was advertising the company via the popular social media website Facebook as well as running his own website.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAIuAAAAJGU0ZTZjMDk3LTAzY2EtNGJlMi05NWU2LThhMGYwMDRlYmQ5Nw

The offences related to advertising services such as debt management, debt counselling and brokerage without authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority.

Mr Govier pleaded guilty to an offence under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and two offences under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Magistrates imposed heavy fines totalling £3,850.

Swansea Council Trading Standards has stated that anyone seeking to advertise a business in this way should seek proper guidance and advice from the relevant regulatory body before they do anything.

Mark Child, Cabinet Member for Wellbeing and Healthy City, said: “Our Trading Standards Team is using social media more and more to look at businesses that are advertising services to see if they are doing it legally.

Consumer Credit and Debt advice is a specialised service which because of it’s nature requires businesses to be fit and properly authorised to carry out those services in a professional manner.

Written by Surrey Trading Standards

 

Avoid and Report Internet Scams and Phishing

Report misleading websites, emails, phone calls or text messages you think may be suspicious.

Don’t give out private information (such as bank details or passwords), reply to text messages, download attachments or click on any links in emails if you’re not sure they’re genuine.

Misleading websites

Some websites can look like they’re part of an official government service or that they provide more help than they actually do.

This might mean you pay for services that you could get cheaper or for free if you used the official government service, eg renewing a passport.

Search on GOV.UK to find official government services – eg if you want to apply for a driving licence or a European Health Insurance Card (EHIC).

Contact Action Fraud to report misleading websites. You must include:

  • the website address or URL
  • how you found the website
  • why you thought it was an official government website

You can report misleading adverts on Google if you’ve clicked on a URL that appears above the normal search results.

HMRC phishing emails and tax scams

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will never use texts or emails to:

  • tell you about a tax rebate or penalty
  • ask for personal or payment information

Forward any suspicious emails to [email protected] or check HMRC’s guidance on recognising scams if you’re not sure.

Report a disclosure of personal details to HMRC

Contact HMRC at [email protected] if you think you’ve given any personal information in reply to a suspicious email or text.

Include brief details of what you disclosed (eg name, address, HMRC User ID, password) but don’t give your personal details in the email.

Visas and immigration

You’ll never be asked to pay for a visa using:

  • cash
  • money transfer

Contact Action Fraud to report visa and immigration scams. You should include:

  • a copy of the suspicious email you received, the sender’s email address and the date and time it was received
  • details of what you sent in a reply, if you replied – eg whether you sent your bank details, address or password

You can also report suspicious emails, letters or telephone calls to the police through Action Fraud.

The Golden Thread – Intelligence, Evidence-based Policy and IP Enforcement

In the past year the EU Observatory on IP Infringements has published two key studies on intellectual property and the way that it is generally perceived. The studies aim to provide much-needed independent evidence to help form a basis for a new narrative that will raise awareness about the global value of intellectual property.

The first report provides compelling evidence about the vital role and contribution that IP-intensive industries make to economic performance and employment within the European Union (https://oami.europa.eu/ohimportal/en/web/observatory/ip-contribution). In brief, these industries directly account for 26% of employment in the European Union; in real terms, this means around 56 million jobs. A further 20 million jobs are generated in businesses that rely on IP-intensive industries. In total gross domestic product (GDP) terms, this corresponds to €4.7 trillion and 90% of trade with the rest of the world. Directly and indirectly, trademarks alone account for over 63.1 million EU jobs and a 34% share (the highest of all IP rights) of the €4.7 trillion GDP figure.

The second report provides a complementary analysis and assessment of how European citizens view and understand intellectual property (https://oami.europa.eu/ohimportal/documents/11370/80606/IP+perception+study). It also reveals the relevant drivers of consumer behaviour in relation to IP-related products, from the physical goods that consumers buy every day to the services and content that they access online. As one might expect, the results reveal sometimes contradictory views. For example, 96% of Europeans believe that intellectual property is important because it supports innovation and creativity by rewarding inventors, creators and artists. What is more, over 86% agree that protecting intellectual property contributes to improvements in the overall quality of genuine products and services. However, the results also show that 10% of all Europeans admit to having engaged in IP infringements over the past 12 months and more than 33% tolerate this behaviour, feeling that breaking the rules can be justified if people have limited buying power or are protesting against economic models driven by a market economy and premium brands. Moreover, 26% of citizens between 15 and 24 years old report having downloaded or accessed copyright-protected content illegally over the last 12 months.

The reports provide food for thought and give a clear indication of where legitimate business and policy makers might need to focus their attention. However, they also provide indisputable signals for counterfeiters. First, they confirm that IP-protected products continue to provide a valuable and constantly developing avenue for their insidious business models. Second, while consumers are now beginning to understand the true value of intellectual property, they still have an insatiable demand for counterfeits, regardless of how dangerous some of the fakes might turn out to be. As a reminder, in an updated report in 2009 the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) estimated that the worldwide trade in counterfeit goods was probably worth up to $250 billion (www.oecd.org/industry/ind/44088872.pdf), and that the range of fake goods being produced crossed every conceivable product sector. The growing problem today is that while fake designer clothes, watches and accessories cost industry and the economy millions in lost revenue and jobs, the emergence of far more dangerous counterfeits – such as alcohol, food, medicines, chemicals, pesticides, perfume, cosmetics and body care products, plus fake power tools and household electrical appliances – is now endangering society as never before.

Operation Pangea, an Interpol-led initiative involving 13 countries, resulted in the seizure of 9.6 million fake and illicit medicines worth over $32 million, including slimming pills, cancer medication, erectile dysfunction pills, cough and cold medication, anti-malarial pills, cholesterol medication and nutritional products (www.interpol.int/Crime-areas/Pharmaceutical-crime/Operations/Operation-Pangea) – a stark reminder of the scale of dangers that we now face and a clear warning to anyone reckless enough to consider buying medicines over the Internet. A further warning – a joint venture between Interpol and Europol, Operation OPSON III, led to the recovery of more than 131,000 litres of oil and vinegar, more than 80,000 biscuits and chocolate bars, 20 tons of spices and condiments, 186 tonnes of cereals, 45 tons of dairy products and 42 litres of honey (www.europol.europa.eu/content/thousands-tonnes-fake-food-and-drink-seized-interpol-europol-operation). Further, the most recent European Commission report on EU customs highlights that in 2013, almost 87,000 detention cases were registered across EU borders. This high number of detentions was caused by the rise in volume of small parcels in express and postal traffic. This is further proof of the ingenuity and development of counterfeiters’ business models, and that people are increasingly taking the risk of using the Internet to buy potentially dubious products from overseas. Worryingly, of the 36 million articles detained, products for daily use – such as body care articles, medicines, toys, electrical household goods – accounted for 25.2%.

There is little doubt that counterfeiting is continuing to spread and cause damage around the world. Those engaged in IP crime are now highly organised in powerful international criminal syndicates which have the funding, resources and links to move massive shipments of goods quickly and effectively across the world in order to raise massive sums of money to fund other criminal activities. So we are not only in a battle to prevent counterfeiting from depriving creators and inventors of their just rewards and destroying brand trust, jobs and much-needed revenue to public finances; we are now engaged in a crusade to dismantle organised criminal networks from threatening the health and safety of consumers across the world.

To help fight this pernicious form of criminality, strong legislation has been put in place across the European Union. This is often complemented by hard-hitting, practical measures taken by both public and private sector bodies at national and international levels. However, with resources stretched, enforcement is under pressure. As a result, despite many remarkable successes, as highlighted above, the volumes of counterfeit goods being discovered are still immense and ever more menacing.

Despite open recognition of the problem and increasing attention paid by Europol, Interpol, the World Customs Organisation, the European Commission and national authorities, there are clear and growing challenges to effective enforcement. Many of these appear to relate to a lack of understanding and knowledge. For example, despite efforts by organisations such as the OECD, it is still not possible to calculate the true scope, scale and impact of the problem. This makes it extremely difficult to focus resources correctly or to influence political and sometimes institutional will in order to take decisive action. While there is continuing and growing pressure on enforcement authorities, again the lack of data does not help us to influence enforcement agendas and key decision makers. Diverse legal frameworks across the world also contain obstacles that affect practices used in enforcement and information exchange. In addition, the fact that penalties differ between jurisdictions has an effect on the courts and the mind-set of the general public in disparate ways. Finally, we can ill afford to ignore the apparent and unquenchable consumer demand for all types of infringing products.

The Anti-Counterfeiting Group (ACG) was set up to help counter many of these problems (www.a-cg.org). Launched in 1980, the ACG is a not-for-profit trade association, recognised as a leading authority on the worldwide trade in fakes. The group represents the interests of over 140 UK and international companies which manufacture practically everything from toothpaste to mobile phones, from chocolate to car parts. Our membership provides a singular platform of experts, including lawyers, trademark agents, policy experts, enforcers and brand protection specialists. As a result, the ACG creates a unique environment in which anti-counterfeiting interests can flourish and collaborate.

Through our lobbying, networking and awareness activities, and in partnership with government, law enforcement agencies and other rights organisations, the ACG campaigns against the trade in fakes on behalf of consumers and legitimate business interests.

Recently, the ACG has also turned its attention to filling the gap on intelligence sharing, to help facilitate more effective enforcement cooperation on behalf of our members. Our intelligence coordinator provides a key link between our members and local and national enforcement authorities. By collating, analysing and developing tactical information and producing specific intelligence packs, he helps to drive more focused individual and joint operations throughout the United Kingdom. This “centred and evidential based approach” is a novel and effective driver in bringing together a range of experts to tackle counterfeiters on the ground.

An example of the success that such an approach can bring is Operation WATCH, a two-pronged programme launched in December 2013 and involving 17 of our members collecting intelligence on the scope and scale of product counterfeiting on Facebook. This work was analysed by our intelligence coordinator, who identified around 30,000 individual listings and hundreds of traders as selling counterfeit goods on the platform. Following this, in an operation guided by the ACG intelligence coordinator, our members carried out administrative takedowns of traders on Facebook which resulted in 650 traders and 2,500 listings being subject to takedown action – this included the removal of infringing images and profiles.

Phase 2 of Operation WATCH took place in June 2014. On this occasion 20 ACG member brands identified a top 20 trader list, some of which were offering for sale several thousand illicit and counterfeit articles and products, ranging from electrical goods to luxury products, clothing, footwear, perfume and fitness DVDs. All 20 were referred to national police and trading standards units for further investigation and a further 179 were subject to administrative takedown activities, with just over 3,000 individual listings and images being removed. In fact, 60% of the traders targeted in this action had their entire Facebook profiles closed down.

Facebook was extremely supportive in this initiative, which was hailed as a significant success by enforcement, government and industry sectors.

To sum up, the ACG exists to represent the voice of business in shaping an effective deterrent to counterfeiting in the United Kingdom. Through our continued participation in political and policy-level debates and our collaborations to help empower multi-agency partnerships and cement international relationships, we help our members and consumers to build safer communities for businesses to flourish. The group is determined to achieve this by helping to:

  • enhance understanding and awareness of the criminal, economic and public harm associated with counterfeiting;
  • create an environment to change opinions and stimulate greater respect for IP rights;
  • encourage more effective government action and the allocation of enforcement resources;
  • foster constructive relationships, collaboration and joint actions between business and law enforcement;
  • provide customised, multi-agency training for those engaged in combating counterfeiting; and
  • develop an inclusive response to counterfeiting by promoting and sharing information, intelligence, best practices, expertise and experiences.

Our ultimate aim is to change society’s perception of counterfeiting as a harmless activity by exposing its worldwide economic and social harm. As explained, we already have over 140 members which are actively engaged. However, we need to ensure that all business sectors are represented. Only by joining together can we continue to ensure that we have a strong single voice to influence those who might still have some doubt about the growing threat of this dark and dangerous crime.

By Alison Statham

ACG_Logo(%26name)_RGB_HiRes.jpg

The Anti-Counterfeiting Group

PO Box 578

High Wycombe

Buckinghamshire

HP11 1YD

United Kingdom

Tel +44 1494 449165

Fax +44 1494 465052

Web www.a-cg.org

‘Big Shock’ as Blackbushe Market is Closed with Immediate Effect

British Car Auctions, which owns the land the market is held upon, confirmed the market will no longer run due to a decline in visitors.

Blackbushe Market has been closed with immediate effect, in a shock announcement by the landowner.

British Car Auctions (BCA), which has owned the land since 1984, confirmed on Tuesday (May 5) that the market will no longer take place due to a decline in trade.

It means Sunday’s market on May 3 was the last one, with stallholders saying the decision came out of the blue to them.

british-car-auctions
British Car Auctions has announced the Blackbushe Sunday market will not be held again

 

In a statement, BCA said: “BCA has confirmed the closure of Blackbushe Sunday Market following consultation with employees.

“The closure comes as a result of the long-term decline in numbers of stallholders and customers.”

Rumours of the market’s imminent closure have been circulating via social media since January, however BCA vehemently denied there was any truth in them.

At the time, BCA even began making regular announcements over the market’s PA refuting rumours that it would close, which continued into the last few weeks.

Despite this, traders were told that the market had been cancelled with immediate effect on Tuesday morning.

Keith Davis from Chiddingfold runs Outdoor Country Wear and has been a stallholder at the market for 35 years.

Mr Davis said: “Sellers and buyers will turn up from all over the country (on Sunday) and they won’t know what’s going on.

“Many of the traders have mortgages to pay and children to feed. They rely on the market to be able to do that. They have customers lined up for the weekend, but now they won’t be there.

“Why didn’t they (BCA) tell us last Sunday? I think it’s because they didn’t want us getting together to stop it. The way they’ve dealt with this is very underhand.

“I’ve heard there are plans to redevelop the site, but we were always told that it is common land and it couldn’t be built on.

“It’s a big shock for the traders who have been at Blackbushe long-term. We supported the market through the lean winter months and now, when business is picking up, they shut it down.

“Many of the traders will struggle to get a spot at any other Sunday market now, because they were given no warning that Blackbushe would close.

“This used to be the biggest and best market in the south east, but it has been let go of due to a lack of interest by the owner. This is really unfair on the people who make a living from the market.

“As traders, we chat to people who might not have many opportunities to get out and meet people. We enjoy a bit of banter with everyone and we do a lot of good that way.”

by Tara O’Connor getHAMPSHIRE 5th May 2015

http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/local-news/big-shock-blackbushe-market-closed-9188126

Alert: Fraudsters Buy-Back Diamond Courier Scam

The National Fraud Intelligence Bureau’s (NFIB) proactive intelligence team is warning people of a new scam dubbed “diamond buy-back courier fraud”.

Information gathered by the NFIB’s proactive intelligence team suggests that boiler rooms operating from overseas (specifically in Thailand) are targeting existing investors of diamonds from victim sucker lists circulated by fraudsters internationally.

How a typical diamond investment scam works

Existing clients who have purchased genuine but lesser value diamonds are contacted by fraudsters who ask if they would like to increase the value of their investment as the return on their current stock has been so good.

They are encouraged to purchase more diamonds and invest further – buying either overpriced or non-existent diamonds.

How investors are scammed into sending their diamonds through a courier

In this new type of scam, the victim is contacted and informed that the value of diamond(s) they have physically purchased have significantly increased due to the rarity and demand.

They are then convinced that in order to revalue the diamond(s) they will need to be physically returned to be assessed by a fake “valuation team”.

Victims are then offered a free of charge, no hassle return service to undertake the valuation process. Intelligence suggests the fraudsters use UPS (United Postal Service) to collect the diamond(s). The fraudsters have no intention of returning the diamonds.

Protect yourself against investment fraud

  • If you’re considering any type of investment, always remember: if it seems too good to be true, then it probably is. High returns can only be achieved with high risk.
  • If you get a call out of the blue, be wary; if in doubt don’t be polite, just hang up.
  • Take the time to seek independent legal or financial advice before making a decision.
  • Always check the credentials of the company you’re dealing with. Check for known fraudulent organisations at the FCA.

All the reports taken by Action Fraud are sent to the NFIB who collate and analyse intelligence on fraud – the NFIB then send crimes to law enforcement agencies for investigation, disruption and prevention purposes.

Recent arrest of diamond investment scammer

The City of London Police (CoLP) recently arrested an Essex man suspected of working in a London boiler room. CoLP in its role as National Policing Lead for Fraud takes on some of the UK’s most significant, complex and high profile cases of investment fraud

The man is believed to have made £1.5 million selling fraudulent diamond investments to victims. He was arrested as a result of reports made to Action Fraud.

To report a fraud and receive a police crime reference number, call Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or use the online fraud reporting tool.

http://www.actionfraud.police.uk/news-alert-fraudsters-are-offering-people-the-chance-to-buy-back-diamonds-they-have-already-been-sold-through-an-investment-scam-apr15

 

Rogue Traders Sentenced after Police Find Cache of Fake Designer Goods

Surelock authenticated the seized Tiffany jewellery and J’Adore perfumes.

When police and trading standards officers opened the doors to two industrial units they found a stash of trendy designer gear.

The only trouble was, it was all fake.

Among 10,000 items spanning 39 big brands was everything from J’Adore perfume to Tiffany jewellery, Hermes purses and Louis Vuitton socks, Bristol Crown Court heard.

And a paper trial of documents led investigators to the two rogue traders in possession of the counterfeit cache.

9846205-largeDarren Ward, 41, of Bleadon in Weston-super-Mare and Timothy Tivney, 35, of Balmoral Way, Weston-super-Mare, both pleaded guilty to unauthorised use of Trade Marks, contrary to the Trade Marks Act 1994, between January and July 2012.

The Recorder of Bristol His Honour Judge Neil Ford QC told them: “The seriousness is that it undermines the goods of the genuine Trade Marks holders.

“Sentencing must involve an element of deterrent.”

The judge handed Ward – who had a history of similar offending – 13 months’ prison suspended for two years, with 250 hours of unpaid work.

He gave Tivney a year’s community order with 80 hours of unpaid work.

Alan Fuller, prosecuting, said the fake goods also included Vans shoes, Adidas trainers, Jo Malone cosmetics, GHD hair straighteners, Chanel sunglasses and Superdry tops.

He said the traders were brought to book after an auction of branded clothes in Bristol in 2011, sold in the name of Ward’s wife.

The court heard they were bought by a Mr Lawson who, when he suspected they were counterfeit, contacted Lacoste and got a refund after his fears were confirmed.

Officers from the South West Regional Trading Standards Enforcement Team (known as Scambusters) assisted police in searching two business units at BW Estate, Old Mixon Crescent, Weston-super-Mare, and found the fake gear as well as paperwork leading to Ward and Tivney.

Though potential loss of £270,000 was estimated for the Trade Mark holders, at their reduced prices Ward was said to have be on for a turnover of £27,000 and Tivney just £3,000.

Richard Shepherd, defending Ward, said his client was setting up a low price food business at the time.

He said father-of-three Ward donated food to food banks and also helped his wife through serious illness.

Mr Shepherd said: “He took a step back in order to make a quick buck, in order to supplement the income of the family.

“Even purchase of fuel was difficult at this time because there was no money coming into the family.”

Oliver Willmott, defending Tivney, said: “He has no intention of ever putting himself on the wrong side of the law again.”

http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Rogue-traders-sentenced-police-cache-fake/story-26325534-detail/story.html#ixzz3XqfCh29q